国际标准化组织调查 ISO认证调查是一项年度调查，旨在统计全球范围内有效ISO管理体系标准认证证书的数量。由国际认可论坛（IAF）多边互认协议（MLA）成员认可的认证机构提供数据，这些数据随后会被上传至国际认可论坛的全球证书数据库——IAFCertSearch.org。 2024年结果 2024 Results 总体数据 Overall figures 下表显示了调查所覆盖各标准的有效证书总数及站点总数。证书是指认证机构在客户证明符合标准后颁发的文件，而"站点"是指组织开展工作或提供服务的固定场所。 The table below displays the total number of valid certificates and the total number of sites for each standard covered by the survey. A certificate is the document issued by a certification body once the client has demonstrated conformity to the standard and a "site" is a permanent location where an organization carries out work or provides a service. 全部结果 Full results 每个标准的详细结果可在https://iafcertsearch.org/services/iso-survey.对于每种标准，证书数量和站点数量都会并排显示。 The detailed results for each standard are available on https://iafcertsearch.org/services/iso-survey. For each of the standards, the number of certificates and the number of sites are displayed next to each other. IAF证书搜索 IAF CertSearch 对于2024年及以后的调查，ISO调查将直接从国际认可论坛（IAF）认证管理体系认证全球数据库IAF CertSearch中的匿名汇总数据中编译。 For the 2024 survey and onwards, the ISO Survey will be compiled directly from anonymised, aggregated data in IAF CertSearch, the International Accreditation Forum’s (IAF) global database of accredited management system certifications. IAF CertSearch是一个全面且值得信赖的全球认证覆盖源，提供最完整、最新的结果，同时简化和减轻认证机构的报告负担。 IAF CertSearch is a comprehensive and trusted source of global certification coverage, delivering the most complete, up-to-date results while streamlining and reducing the reporting burden for certification bodies. 注：IAF CertSearch由ISO和IAF的联合合作伙伴Quality Trade开发和运营。 Note: IAF CertSearch is developed and operated by Quality Trade, the joint partner of both ISO and IAF. 结果亮点 Results highlights 77个认证机构中有76个及其2400多个认证机构参加了IAF CertSearch，表明其在全球范围内得到了广泛采用。 76 of the 77 accreditation bodies and their 2,400+ certification bodies participated in IAF CertSearch, demonstrating strong global adoption. 今年的结果受到德国DAkkS认证机构缺席的影响，这些机构无法通过IAF CertSearch共享ISO调查的数据。虽然DAkkS下的一些认证机构主动直接与IAF CertSearch共享结果，但并非所有机构都这样做。所有DAkkS认证机构的缺失对德国的统计数据产生了影响。 This year’s results were impacted by the missing participation of Germany’s DAkkS certification bodies, who were unable to share data for the ISO Survey via IAF CertSearch. While some certification bodies under DAkkS proactively shared results directly with IAF CertSearch, not all did. The absence of all DAkkS certification bodies had an impact on German statistics. 中国与IAF CertSearch合作参加了今年的ISO调查。这加强了调查结果的准确性，数据来源于官方政府机构，并得到了CNAS关于以下标准的认证信息和现场估计的补充：ISO 9001、ISO 14001、ISO 45001、ISO/IEC 27001、ISO 22000、ISO 50001和ISO/IEC 20000-1。此外，所有标准都包括由CNAS以外的认证机构认证的认证机构上传到IAF CertSearch的数据。应该指出的是，CNAS没有为一些没有信息的标准提供数据。 China participated in this year’s ISO Survey in collaboration with IAF CertSearch. This strengthened the accuracy of the survey results, with data sourced from the official government authority, complemented by input from CNAS regarding accreditation information and site estimates for the following standards: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22000, ISO 50001, and ISO/IEC 20000-1. In addition, data uploaded to IAF CertSearch by certification bodies accredited by accreditation bodies other than CNAS was included for all standards. It should be noted that CNAS did not provide data for some standards where information was not available. ISO 28000的数据尚未完全填充，这可能会在下一次调查中增加。 Data for ISO 28000 has not been fully populated, this will likely increase in the next survey. 免责声明 Disclaimer ISO调查基于IAF CertSearch的数据，这是一个官方的全球认证数据库。IAF CertSearch主要由认可的认证机构在其监督下填充。虽然绝大多数认证机构已经上传了他们的数据，但一小部分尚未完成这一过程。因此，有限数量的证书可能尚未反映在数据库中，因此也未反映在调查中。 The ISO Survey is based on data from IAF CertSearch, the official global database of accredited certification. IAF CertSearch is populated primarily by accredited certification bodies, under the oversight of their accreditation bodies. While the vast majority of certification bodies have uploaded their data, a small percentage have not yet completed this process. As a result, a limited number of certificates may not yet be reflected in the database and therefore the survey. 对结果的解释和对趋势的任何结论都应考虑到，覆盖范围可能因国家、行业和标准而异。 Interpretations of the results and any conclusions on trends should take into account that coverage may vary slightly across countries, industries, and standards. 
